| From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning |
| Date: | 2017-02-21 04:27:24 |
| Message-ID: | f54f62c9-562f-a97e-7f86-40cacef804cb@lab.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017/02/21 12:10, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> I think, that's a limitation till we implement global indexes. But
> nothing in the current implementation stops us from implementing it.
> In fact, I remember, a reply from Robert to another thread on
> partitioning started in parallel to Amit's thread had explained some
> of these design decisions. I am unable to find link to that exact
> reply though.
Are you perhaps thinking of the message titled "design for a partitioning
feature (was: inheritance)" a few months back:
Thanks,
Amit
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2017-02-21 04:33:01 | Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning |
| Previous Message | Rafia Sabih | 2017-02-21 03:48:03 | Re: Passing query string to workers |