| From: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning |
| Date: | 2017-02-21 04:33:01 |
| Message-ID: | CAFjFpReY_0zcs=diKLN5=yWw0Onb0wG0wS21o35zmfr0L45QSg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On 2017/02/21 12:10, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
>> I think, that's a limitation till we implement global indexes. But
>> nothing in the current implementation stops us from implementing it.
>> In fact, I remember, a reply from Robert to another thread on
>> partitioning started in parallel to Amit's thread had explained some
>> of these design decisions. I am unable to find link to that exact
>> reply though.
>
> Are you perhaps thinking of the message titled "design for a partitioning
> feature (was: inheritance)" a few months back:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoZeV0nryvw9cNB81xdOJg4XtpJMKDif0zTo-GdLcOCgcQ@mail.gmail.com
Thanks a lot, that's the one I was searching for. And now that I
confirm it, there's NO reply to Robert's mail.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2017-02-21 04:50:07 | Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2017-02-21 04:27:24 | Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning |