Re: IPC/MultixactCreation on the Standby server

From: Dmitry <dsy(dot)075(at)yandex(dot)ru>
To: Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>
Cc: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: IPC/MultixactCreation on the Standby server
Date: 2025-08-05 14:36:26
Message-ID: f3ed5716-57f4-40a8-af25-431f4f517fb3@yandex.ru
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 31.07.2025 09:29, Andrey Borodin wrote:
> Here's an updated two patches, one for Postgres 17 and one for
> mater(with a test).
I ran tests on PG17 with patch v9.

I tried to reproduce it for three cases, the first when we explicitly
use for key share, the second through subtransactions
and the third, through implicit use of for key share, through an foreign
key.

There are no more sessions hanging on the replica, that's great!

Thank you all very much!

Best regards,
Dmitry.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2025-08-05 14:41:03 Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2025-08-05 14:33:38 Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression