Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Test to dump and restore objects left behind by regression
Date: 2025-08-05 14:41:03
Message-ID: CA27C95A-DD8E-4CBD-B840-45CDE1C2B430@yesql.se
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 5 Aug 2025, at 16:33, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:

> I happened to notice that this item was still open in the commitfest,
> and rereading the thread I now have second thoughts about having it
> enabled by default, giving your complaints about speed. How about
> applying this to 18 and master?

Thanks for reviving this. I am +1 on placing this behind PG_TEST_EXTRA as was
discussed upthread.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2025-08-05 14:52:44 Re: index prefetching
Previous Message Dmitry 2025-08-05 14:36:26 Re: IPC/MultixactCreation on the Standby server