| From: | Martin Kalcher <martin(dot)kalcher(at)aboutsource(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal to introduce a shuffle function to intarray extension |
| Date: | 2022-07-18 07:47:30 |
| Message-ID: | f36445ec-aad9-0531-39f8-ca3a3bb4860e@aboutsource.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Am 18.07.22 um 01:20 schrieb Tom Lane:
> (Having said that, even if we were going to implement it with that
> definition, I should think that it'd be easiest to do so on the
> array-of-Datums representation produced by deconstruct_array.
> That way you don't need to do different things for different element
> types.)
Thank you Tom, here is a patch utilising deconstruct_array(). If we
agree, that this is the way to go, i would like to add array_sample()
(good name?), some test cases, and documentation.
One more question. How do i pick a Oid for the functions?
Martin
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-introduce-array_shuffle.patch | text/x-patch | 2.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daulat | 2022-07-18 07:55:30 | More than one Cluster on single server (single instance) |
| Previous Message | Martin Kalcher | 2022-07-18 07:12:50 | Re: Proposal to introduce a shuffle function to intarray extension |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2022-07-18 08:05:23 | Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v10 |
| Previous Message | Richard Guo | 2022-07-18 07:13:05 | Re: Problem about postponing gathering partial paths for topmost scan/join rel |