From: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v10 |
Date: | 2022-07-18 08:05:23 |
Message-ID: | CAJ7c6TPO91eG4wK2WdnZXXov3itJz2swEVvTurQMRu+Yd7fnqA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Andres,
> Attached is v10 of the meson patchset. Lots of small changes, I don't think
> anything major. I tried to address most of Peter's feedback for the earlier
> patches.
>
> After this I plan to clean up the "export" patch, since that's I think the
> next bigger step, and an improvement on its own. The step after will be to
> discuss where we want the output of tests to reside, whether the naming scheme
> for tests is good etc.
>
> I did try to address Peter's criticism around inconsistency of the added
> parameters to perl scripts. I hope it's more consistent now. I used the
> opportunity to make src/tools/msvc use the "output directory" parameters,
> providing coverage for those paths (and removing a few unnecessary chdirs, but
> ...).
Thanks for continuing to work on this!
Just a quick question - is there a reason for changing the subject of
the emails?
Not all email clients handle this well, e.g. Google Mail considers
this being 10 separate threads. The CF application and/or
pgsql-hackers@ archive also don't recognise this as a continuation of
the original thread. So all the discussions in -v8, -v9, -v9 ets
threads get lost.
May I suggest using a single thread?
--
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2022-07-18 08:12:10 | Re: [RFC] building postgres with meson - v10 |
Previous Message | Martin Kalcher | 2022-07-18 07:47:30 | Re: Proposal to introduce a shuffle function to intarray extension |