Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

From: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date: 2018-03-03 01:00:46
Message-ID: f288c9a2-fbad-6245-c061-90042f2d63ea@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/02/2018 09:05 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2018-03-01 21:39:36 -0500, David Steele wrote:
>> On 3/1/18 9:33 PM, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>> On 03/02/2018 02:12 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>>>> Hm, this CF entry is marked as needs review as of 2018-03-01 12:54:48,
>>>> but I don't see a newer version posted?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ah, apologies - that's due to moving the patch from the last CF (it was
>>> marked as RWF so I had to reopen it before moving it). I'll submit a new
>>> version of the patch shortly, please mark it as WOA until then.
>>
>> Marked as Waiting on Author.
>
> Sorry to be the hard-ass, but given this patch hasn't been moved forward
> since 2018-01-19, I'm not sure why it's elegible to be in this CF in the
> first place?
>

That is somewhat misleading, I think. You're right the last version was
submitted on 2018-01-19, but the next review arrived on 2018-01-31, i.e.
right at the end of the CF. So it's not like the patch was sitting there
with unresolved issues. Based on that review the patch was marked as RWF
and thus not moved to 2018-03 automatically.

regards

--
Tomas Vondra http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2018-03-03 01:01:53 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-03-03 00:56:03 Re: [HACKERS] user-defined numeric data types triggering ERROR: unsupported type