Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date: 2018-03-03 01:01:53
Message-ID: 20180303010153.myd3f2bcdvqo6ry5@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2018-03-03 02:00:46 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> That is somewhat misleading, I think. You're right the last version was
> submitted on 2018-01-19, but the next review arrived on 2018-01-31, i.e.
> right at the end of the CF. So it's not like the patch was sitting there
> with unresolved issues. Based on that review the patch was marked as RWF
> and thus not moved to 2018-03 automatically.

I don't see how this changes anything.

- Andres

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2018-03-03 01:15:56 Re: [HACKERS] user-defined numeric data types triggering ERROR: unsupported type
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2018-03-03 01:00:46 Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions