From: | geek+(at)cmu(dot)edu |
---|---|
To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: AW: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2 |
Date: | 1999-03-25 21:02:40 |
Message-ID: | emacs-smtp-2711-14074-42096-361803@export.andrew.cmu.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Then <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> spoke up and said:
> I'm not convinced that accurate stats are worth that cost, but I don't
> know how big the cost would be anyway. Anyone have a feel for it?
They are definitely *not* worth the cost. Especially since no table
will have the default 0 rows entry after a single vacuum analyze of
that table. Let's be honest: if you aren't interested in doing a
vacuum, then really aren't interested in performance, anyway.
--
=====================================================================
| JAVA must have been developed in the wilds of West Virginia. |
| After all, why else would it support only single inheritance?? |
=====================================================================
| Finger geek(at)cmu(dot)edu for my public key. |
=====================================================================
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 1999-03-25 22:51:40 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) |
Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 1999-03-25 20:20:54 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO (was: Developers Globe (FINAL)) |