Re: multi-install PostgresNode fails with older postgres versions

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: multi-install PostgresNode fails with older postgres versions
Date: 2021-04-12 13:52:24
Message-ID: efe8a5b0-b100-83e7-4132-4acc49a139a4@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 4/12/21 8:59 AM, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 20:07:41 +0200
> Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais <jgdr(at)dalibo(dot)com> wrote:
> [...]
>>>> Let me know if it worth that I work on an official patch.
>>> Let's give it a try ...
>> OK
> So, as promised, here is my take to port my previous work on PostgreSQL
> source tree.
>
> Make check pass with no errors. The new class probably deserve some own TAP
> tests.
>
> Note that I added a PostgresVersion class for easier and cleaner version
> comparisons. This could be an interesting take away no matter what.
>
> I still have some more ideas to cleanup, revamp and extend the base class, but
> I prefer to go incremental to keep things review-ability.
>

Thanks for this. We have been working somewhat on parallel lines. With
your permission I'm going to take some of what you've done and
incorporate it in the patch I'm working on.

A PostgresVersion class is a good idea - I was already contemplating
something of the kind.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantina Skovola 2021-04-12 13:56:20 [GSoC 2021 proposal] pl/julia extension
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2021-04-12 13:33:10 Re: Replication slot stats misgivings