Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers for nulls/values arrays

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Smith, Peter" <peters(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Make use of C99 designated initialisers for nulls/values arrays
Date: 2019-10-01 12:40:26
Message-ID: ed668d91-7301-6b78-8ee4-70bf50b30869@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 10/1/19 6:12 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 1:25 PM Smith, Peter <peters(at)fast(dot)au(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>> Dear Hackers,
>>
>> I have identified some OSS code which maybe can make use of C99 designated initialisers for nulls/values arrays.
>>
>> ~
>>
>> Background:
>> There are lots of tuple operations where arrays of values and flags are being passed.
>> Typically these arrays are being previously initialised 0/false by memset.
>> By modifying code to use C99 designated initialiser syntax [1], most of these memsets can become redundant.
>> Actually, this mechanism is already being used in some of the existing OSS code. This patch/proposal just propagates the same idea to all other similar places I could find.
>>
>> ~
>>
>> Result:
>> Less code. Removes ~200 unnecessary memsets.
>> More consistent initialisation.
>>
> +1. This seems like an improvement. I can review and take this
> forward unless there are objections from others.
>
>

+1.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2019-10-01 13:18:03 Re: Optimize partial TOAST decompression
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2019-10-01 12:34:20 Re: Optimize partial TOAST decompression