| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pageinspect: Hash index support |
| Date: | 2016-11-01 19:28:32 |
| Message-ID: | eb68fb02-5a85-e643-11cf-9319dd7edf2b@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/3/16 8:52 AM, Jesper Pedersen wrote:
> On 09/29/2016 04:02 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 9/29/16 4:00 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> Since the commit fest is drawing to a close, I'll set this patch as
>>> returned with feedback.
>>
>> Actually, the CF app informs me that moving to the next CF is more
>> appropriate, so I have done that.
>>
>
> Ok, thanks for your feedback.
>
> Maybe "Returned with Feedback" is more appropriate, as there is still
> development left.
I have applied the documentation change that introduced subsections,
which seems quite useful independently. I have also committed the tests
that I proposed and will work through the failures.
As no new patch has been posted for the 2016-11 CF, I will close the
patch entry now. Please submit an updated patch when you have the time,
keeping an eye on ongoing work to update hash indexes.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-11-01 19:32:14 | Re: auto_explain vs. parallel query |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-11-01 19:13:16 | Re: Speed up Clog Access by increasing CLOG buffers |