Re: pageinspect: Hash index support

From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pageinspect: Hash index support
Date: 2016-11-02 16:43:42
Message-ID: bc1cd5c0-2619-7a49-7455-59db07e274c1@redhat.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/01/2016 03:28 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Ok, thanks for your feedback.
>>
>> Maybe "Returned with Feedback" is more appropriate, as there is still
>> development left.
>
> I have applied the documentation change that introduced subsections,
> which seems quite useful independently. I have also committed the tests
> that I proposed and will work through the failures.
>
> As no new patch has been posted for the 2016-11 CF, I will close the
> patch entry now. Please submit an updated patch when you have the time,
> keeping an eye on ongoing work to update hash indexes.
>

Agreed.

Best regards,
Jesper

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2016-11-02 16:49:16 Re: auto_explain vs. parallel query
Previous Message Adam Brusselback 2016-11-02 16:41:00 Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers