Re: [HACKERS] Horrible CREATE DATABASE Performance in High Sierra

From: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Brent Dearth <brent(dot)dearth(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Horrible CREATE DATABASE Performance in High Sierra
Date: 2018-09-19 05:23:51
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 19/09/2018 16:38, Tom Lane wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> What is the status of this? Is performance on High Sierra still bad?
>> I committed the fix at 643c27e36. If Apple have done anything about the
>> underlying problem, you couldn't tell it from their non-response to my
>> bug report.
> So, after just about one year of radio silence, I received email from
> Apple saying that (a) they'd closed my bug report as a duplicate of
> another one, and (b) that other one was also closed, and (c) not one
> other iota of information.
> This seems to be standard practice for them, though I'm at a loss
> to say why they consider it even minimally acceptable. From here,
> it seems like a great way to piss people off and ensure they won't
> bother filing any future bug reports.
> Anyway, reading the tea leaves and considering the timing, one might
> guess that they actually fixed the problem as of macOS Mojave.
> regards, tom lane
Don't worry your tiny little mind, Apple knows best what is good for you!

[Smileys omitted, due to budget constraints]

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2018-09-19 05:40:31 Re: Changing the setting of wal_sender_timeout per standby
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-09-19 05:20:34 Re: Problem while setting the fpw with SIGHUP