Re: unlogged sequences

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: unlogged sequences
Date: 2022-03-24 13:10:58
Message-ID: e9d61c9b-7613-27de-3d52-d4dda3f22dc1@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Here is an updated patch that now also includes SET LOGGED/UNLOGGED
support. So this version addresses all known issues and open problems.

On 28.02.22 10:56, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> rebased patch, no functional changes
>
> On 11.02.22 10:12, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 25.06.19 20:37, Andres Freund wrote:
>>> I.e. I think it'd be better if we just added a fork argument to
>>> fill_seq_with_data(), and then do something like
>>>
>>> smgrcreate(srel, INIT_FORKNUM, false);
>>> log_smgrcreate(&rel->rd_node, INIT_FORKNUM);
>>> fill_seq_with_data(rel, tuple, INIT_FORKNUM);
>>>
>>> and add a FlushBuffer() to the end of fill_seq_with_data() if writing
>>> INIT_FORKNUM. The if (RelationNeedsWAL(rel)) would need an || forkNum ==
>>> INIT_FORKNUM.
>>
>> Now that logical replication of sequences is nearing completion, I
>> figured it would be suitable to dust off this old discussion on
>> unlogged sequences, mainly so that sequences attached to unlogged
>> tables can be excluded from replication.
>>
>> Attached is a new patch that incorporates the above suggestions, with
>> some slight refactoring.  The only thing I didn't/couldn't do was to
>> call FlushBuffers(), since that is not an exported function.  So this
>> still calls FlushRelationBuffers(), which was previously not liked.
>> Ideas welcome.
>>
>> I have also re-tested the crash reported by Michael Paquier in the old
>> discussion and added test cases that catch them.
>>
>> The rest of the patch is just documentation, DDL support, client
>> support, etc.
>>
>> What is not done yet is support for ALTER SEQUENCE ... SET
>> LOGGED/UNLOGGED.  This is a bit of a problem because:
>>
>> 1. The new behavior is that a serial/identity sequence of a new
>> unlogged table is now also unlogged.
>> 2. There is also a new restriction that changing a table to logged is
>> not allowed if it is linked to an unlogged sequence.  (This is IMO
>> similar to the existing restriction on linking mixed logged/unlogged
>> tables via foreign keys.)
>> 3. Thus, currently, you can't create an unlogged table with a
>> serial/identity column and then change it to logged.  This is
>> reflected in some of the test changes I had to make in alter_table.sql
>> to work around this.  These should eventually go away.
>>
>> Interestingly, there is grammar support for ALTER SEQUENCE ... SET
>> LOGGED/UNLOGGED because there is this:
>>
>>          |   ALTER SEQUENCE qualified_name alter_table_cmds
>>                  {
>>                      AlterTableStmt *n = makeNode(AlterTableStmt);
>>                      n->relation = $3;
>>                      n->cmds = $4;
>>                      n->objtype = OBJECT_SEQUENCE;
>>                      n->missing_ok = false;
>>                      $$ = (Node *)n;
>>                  }
>>
>> But it is rejected later in tablecmds.c.  In fact, it appears that
>> this piece of grammar is currently useless because there are no
>> alter_table_cmds that actually work for sequences.  (This used to be
>> different because things like OWNER TO also went through here.)
>>
>> I tried to make tablecmds.c handle sequences as well, but that became
>> messy.  So I'm thinking about making ALTER SEQUENCE ... SET
>> LOGGED/UNLOGGED an entirely separate code path and rip out the above
>> grammar, but that needs some further pondering.
>>
>> But all that is a bit of a separate effort, so in the meantime some
>> review of the changes in and around fill_seq_with_data() would be useful.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-Unlogged-sequences.patch text/plain 38.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2022-03-24 13:11:01 Re: Remove an unnecessary errmsg_plural in dependency.c
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2022-03-24 13:07:35 Re: Remove an unnecessary errmsg_plural in dependency.c