Re: Crash on promotion when recovery.conf is renamed

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Crash on promotion when recovery.conf is renamed
Date: 2017-03-16 15:12:17
Message-ID: e8ba1d9e-7b6b-87c3-fc9f-0f53e8f8c501@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/20/16 2:54 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>> Looking at PrescanPreparedTransactions(), I am thinking as well that it
>>> would
>>> be better to get a hard failure when bumping on a corrupted 2PC file.
>>> Future
>>> files are one thing, but corrupted files should be treated more carefully.
>>
>>
>> Again without looking at it, I agree (so much easier that way :P). Ignoring
>> corruption is generally a bad idea. Failing hard makes the user notice the
>> error, and makes it possible to initiate recovery from a standby or from
>> backups or something, or to *intentionally* remove/clear/ignore it.
>
> And I am finishing with the two patches attached:
> - 0001 changes the 2PC checks so as corrupted entries are FATAL.
> PreScanPreparedTransaction is used when a hot standby is initialized.
> In this case a failure protects the range of XIDs generated,
> potentially saving from corruption of data. At the end of recovery,
> this is done before any on-disk actions are taken.
> - 0002 is the thing that Heikki has sent previously to minimize the
> window between end-of-recovery record write and timeline history file
> archiving.
>
> I am attaching that to next CF.

This patch still applies cleanly and compiles at cccbdde.

Any idea when you'll have a chance to review?

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-03-16 15:12:36 Re: Parallel Bitmap scans a bit broken
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-03-16 15:06:52 Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables