Re: Benchmarking PG

From: "Josh Tolley" <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Manolo _" <mac_man2005(at)hotmail(dot)it>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Benchmarking PG
Date: 2007-12-11 11:16:02
Message-ID: e7e0a2570712110316n57497981i7f486fadfc54eba2@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Dec 11, 2007 4:06 AM, Manolo _ <mac_man2005(at)hotmail(dot)it> wrote:
>
> Hi to all.
>
> I'd like to benchmark PG. I'd like to compare sorting performances (time spent, #of disk accesses, # of run produced etc) of the present Replacement Selection (external sorting) algorithm and of a refinement I'm going to implement.
>
> I'm new on PG, I just had the idea of how to possibly get better that algorithm and choosed to test it on PG since it's an open-source DBMS.
>
> I've been searching the web for a benchmark. I suppose TPC-H and Wisconsin could fit, but had problems when trying to use them.
> Any suggestion on a "good benchmark"?
> Any tutorial on how to use them?
>
> Thanks for your time.
>
> Regards.
> Manolo.
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>

Well, there's pgbench. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/pgbench.html

- Josh / eggyknap

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-12-11 11:21:28 Re: libgcc double-free, backend won't die
Previous Message Manolo _ 2007-12-11 11:06:52 Benchmarking PG