Re: [PATCH] fix references to like_regex

From: Gilles Darold <gilles(at)migops(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix references to like_regex
Date: 2021-11-02 15:56:10
Message-ID: e7990184-2619-3891-597f-58e6de780f6f@migops.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Le 02/11/2021 à 16:50, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Gilles Darold <gilles(at)migops(dot)com> writes:
>> Since we have the regexp_like operator I have found that there is two
>> references in the documentation about PostgreSQL lacking of LIKE_REGEX
>> implementation. Here is a patch to fix the documentation. I simply
>> remove the reference to non exist of LIKE_REGEX in PostgreSQL in chapter
>> "9.7.3.8 Differences from XQuery"  And try to modify chapter "9.16.2.3.
>> SQL/JSON Regular Expressions" to mention the REGEXP_LIKE operator. For
>> the second fix there should be better wording.
> I don't think we should change these (yet). regexp_like() is *not*
> LIKE_REGEX, precisely because it's using a slightly different
> regular-expression language than what the spec calls for.
> At some point we may provide a skin for the regexp engine that
> duplicates the spec's definition, and then we can implement
> LIKE_REGEX for real.

Thanks for clarifying, I thought it was an oversight.

Regards

--
Gilles Darold

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2021-11-02 15:57:12 Re: archive modules
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-11-02 15:55:23 Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box?