Re: [PATCH] fix references to like_regex

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Gilles Darold <gilles(at)migops(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix references to like_regex
Date: 2021-11-02 15:50:47
Message-ID: 1513225.1635868247@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Gilles Darold <gilles(at)migops(dot)com> writes:
> Since we have the regexp_like operator I have found that there is two
> references in the documentation about PostgreSQL lacking of LIKE_REGEX
> implementation. Here is a patch to fix the documentation. I simply
> remove the reference to non exist of LIKE_REGEX in PostgreSQL in chapter
> "9.7.3.8 Differences from XQuery"  And try to modify chapter "9.16.2.3.
> SQL/JSON Regular Expressions" to mention the REGEXP_LIKE operator. For
> the second fix there should be better wording.

I don't think we should change these (yet). regexp_like() is *not*
LIKE_REGEX, precisely because it's using a slightly different
regular-expression language than what the spec calls for.
At some point we may provide a skin for the regexp engine that
duplicates the spec's definition, and then we can implement
LIKE_REGEX for real.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2021-11-02 15:55:23 Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box?
Previous Message Bossart, Nathan 2021-11-02 15:39:38 Re: inefficient loop in StandbyReleaseLockList()