| From: | "Pierre Barre" <pierre(at)barre(dot)sh> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Laurenz Albe" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL on S3-backed Block Storage with Near-Local Performance |
| Date: | 2025-07-24 18:12:19 |
| Message-ID: | e70e1669-4f00-47dc-a221-537f33ef882c@app.fastmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> "NFS" is a key word that does not inspire confidence in
PostgreSQL circles...
Coming back to this, I just implemented 9P, which should translates to proper semantics for FSYNC.
mount -t 9p -o trans=tcp,port=5564,version=9p2000.L,msize=65536,access=user 127.0.0.1 /mnt/9p
Best,
Pierre
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025, at 06:40, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-07-18 at 00:57 +0200, Pierre Barre wrote:
>> Looking forward to your feedback and questions!
>
> I think the biggest hurdle you will have to overcome is to
> convince notoriously paranoid DBAs that this tall stack
> provides reliable service, honors fsync() etc.
>
> Performance is great, but it is not everything. If things
> perform surprisingly well, people become suspicious.
>
>> P.S. The full project includes a custom NFS filesystem too.
>
> "NFS" is a key word that does not inspire confidence in
> PostgreSQL circles...
>
> Yours,
> Laurenz Albe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nico Williams | 2025-07-24 19:41:37 | Re: PostgreSQL on S3-backed Block Storage with Near-Local Performance |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2025-07-24 14:48:04 | Re: Is there any limit on the number of rows to import using copy command |