| From: | Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Pierre Barre <pierre(at)barre(dot)sh>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL on S3-backed Block Storage with Near-Local Performance |
| Date: | 2025-07-24 19:41:37 |
| Message-ID: | aIKMcZOz5ZYeF6C9@ubby |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 06:40:58AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-07-18 at 00:57 +0200, Pierre Barre wrote:
> > Looking forward to your feedback and questions!
>
> I think the biggest hurdle you will have to overcome is to
> convince notoriously paranoid DBAs that this tall stack
> provides reliable service, honors fsync() etc.
Is there a test suite that can be used to test PG's ACIDity in the face
of simulated power failures?
> Performance is great, but it is not everything. If things
> perform surprisingly well, people become suspicious.
+1
> > P.S. The full project includes a custom NFS filesystem too.
>
> "NFS" is a key word that does not inspire confidence in
> PostgreSQL circles...
Certainly NFSv3 should. NFSv4 is much safer but I've no experience
running PG on it and I assume there will be cases where recovery from
network and/or server failures is slow.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Nico Williams | 2025-07-24 19:44:46 | Re: PostgreSQL on S3-backed Block Storage with Near-Local Performance |
| Previous Message | Pierre Barre | 2025-07-24 18:12:19 | Re: PostgreSQL on S3-backed Block Storage with Near-Local Performance |