Re: PostgreSQL on S3-backed Block Storage with Near-Local Performance

From: Nico Williams <nico(at)cryptonector(dot)com>
To: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Pierre Barre <pierre(at)barre(dot)sh>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL on S3-backed Block Storage with Near-Local Performance
Date: 2025-07-24 19:41:37
Message-ID: aIKMcZOz5ZYeF6C9@ubby
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 06:40:58AM +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-07-18 at 00:57 +0200, Pierre Barre wrote:
> > Looking forward to your feedback and questions!
>
> I think the biggest hurdle you will have to overcome is to
> convince notoriously paranoid DBAs that this tall stack
> provides reliable service, honors fsync() etc.

Is there a test suite that can be used to test PG's ACIDity in the face
of simulated power failures?

> Performance is great, but it is not everything. If things
> perform surprisingly well, people become suspicious.

+1

> > P.S. The full project includes a custom NFS filesystem too.
>
> "NFS" is a key word that does not inspire confidence in
> PostgreSQL circles...

Certainly NFSv3 should. NFSv4 is much safer but I've no experience
running PG on it and I assume there will be cases where recovery from
network and/or server failures is slow.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nico Williams 2025-07-24 19:44:46 Re: PostgreSQL on S3-backed Block Storage with Near-Local Performance
Previous Message Pierre Barre 2025-07-24 18:12:19 Re: PostgreSQL on S3-backed Block Storage with Near-Local Performance