Re: split TOAST support out of postgres.h

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: split TOAST support out of postgres.h
Date: 2023-01-10 05:07:49
Message-ID: e6c67eca-f55e-4c8f-03f4-e6104c7373f4@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 30.12.22 17:50, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> On 28.12.22 16:07, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I dunno, #3 seems kind of unprincipled. Also, since fmgr.h is included
>>> so widely, I doubt it is buying very much in terms of reducing header
>>> footprint. How bad is it to do #2?
>
>> See this incremental patch set.
>
> Wow, 41 files requiring varatt.h is a lot fewer than I would have guessed.
> I think that bears out my feeling that fmgr.h wasn't a great location:
> I count 117 #includes of that, many of which are in .h files themselves
> so that many more .c files would be required to read them.

committed

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brar Piening 2023-01-10 05:12:44 Re: doc: add missing "id" attributes to extension packaging page
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2023-01-10 04:57:22 Re: typos