| From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT. |
| Date: | 2021-11-04 21:25:54 |
| Message-ID: | e66ba96e74935dbcaed38b61d4d4bad6e551ca78.camel@j-davis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 12:37 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I don't have anything specific to propose, which I realize is kind of
> unhelpful ... but I don't like this, either.
We can go back to having a pg_checkpoint predefined role that is only
used for the CHECKPOINT command.
The only real argument against that was a general sense of clutter, but
I wasn't entirely convinced of that. If we have a specialized command,
we have all kinds of clutter associated with that; a predefined role
doesn't add much additional clutter.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2021-11-04 22:07:47 | Re: Possible Documentation Update for ALTER STATISTICS |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2021-11-04 21:25:20 | Re: parallel vacuum comments |