| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT. |
| Date: | 2021-11-05 12:40:27 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmobUz8Hs4Y5obdHVvMNCFteom_oismnus1z_eV9+Yjh05Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 5:25 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-11-04 at 12:37 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > I don't have anything specific to propose, which I realize is kind of
> > unhelpful ... but I don't like this, either.
>
> We can go back to having a pg_checkpoint predefined role that is only
> used for the CHECKPOINT command.
I would prefer that approach. Other people may prefer other things,
but if I got to pick, I'd say do it that way.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2021-11-05 12:42:58 | Re: Predefined role pg_maintenance for VACUUM, ANALYZE, CHECKPOINT. |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2021-11-05 12:36:52 | Re: [PATCH] Added TRANSFORM FOR for COMMENT tab completion |