Re: Failure in commit_ts tap tests

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Failure in commit_ts tap tests
Date: 2017-01-24 10:06:34
Message-ID: e6084b89-07a7-7e57-51ee-d7b8fc9ec864@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/24/2017 03:18 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 01/23/2017 09:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> On 01/23/2017 09:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>>>> On 01/20/2017 01:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>>>> It looks like at least part of the answer is that the buildfarm isn't
>>>>>> running this test. AFAICS, it runs "make installcheck" not
>>>>>> "make check" in src/test/modules.
>>> OK, so should we just change "make installcheck" to "make check"?
>> I'm in favor (just for src/test/modules, to be clear).
>>
>>
>
>
> Yes. There will be some consequent buildfarm code cleanup, but this will
> test shortly on crake.
>

Well, that crashed. The DDL deparse comment test should not assume that
contrib_regression exists. Possibly it should create it if it doesn't
exist. The buildfarm mostly runs with USE_DB_MODULE=1 so we don't
constantly overwrite the same db.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2017-01-24 10:17:12 Re: Failure in commit_ts tap tests
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2017-01-24 09:46:16 Re: parallelize queries containing subplans