Re: Failure in commit_ts tap tests

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Failure in commit_ts tap tests
Date: 2017-01-24 08:18:24
Message-ID: 160290f8-ae98-b122-0b48-44805495f172@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/23/2017 09:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 01/23/2017 09:03 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>>> On 01/20/2017 01:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>>> It looks like at least part of the answer is that the buildfarm isn't
>>>>> running this test. AFAICS, it runs "make installcheck" not
>>>>> "make check" in src/test/modules.
>> OK, so should we just change "make installcheck" to "make check"?
> I'm in favor (just for src/test/modules, to be clear).
>
>

Yes. There will be some consequent buildfarm code cleanup, but this will
test shortly on crake.

cheers

andrew

--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mithun Cy 2017-01-24 08:26:03 Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.
Previous Message Torsten Zuehlsdorff 2017-01-24 08:05:35 Re: Checksums by default?