On 10/11/07, Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Hannu Krosing wrote:
> > For what use cases do you think your WAL-based approach is better than
> > Slony/Skytools trigger-based one ?
>
> A pure trigger based approach can only replicate data for the commands
> which fire triggers. AFAIK Slony is unable to replicate TRUNCATE
> command (I don't know if Skytools can). Replicator doesn't have this
> limitation.
No, Skytools is same as Slony.
Can you also replicate changes to system tables?
--
marko