Alexey Klyukin wrote:
>
>
>> For what use cases do you think your WAL-based approach is better than
>> Slony/Skytools trigger-based one ?
>>
>
> A pure trigger based approach can only replicate data for the commands
> which fire triggers. AFAIK Slony is unable to replicate TRUNCATE
> command
It could be wrapped with ddl_script which obviously isn't transparent to
the application, but I guess a table that's truncated regularly won't be
a typical candidate for (async) replication either.
Regards,
Andreas