From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL" |
Date: | 2021-06-13 11:36:28 |
Message-ID: | e38551ee-60af-6072-9ec3-59588240eb7a@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6/13/21 7:13 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 07:36:54AM +0100, Geoff Winkless wrote:
>> On Thu, 10 Jun 2021, 15:35 Alvaro Herrera, <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>>> src/backend/libpq/auth.c:847: * has. If it's an MD5 hash, we must do
>>> MD5 authentication, and if it's a
>>> src/backend/libpq/auth.c:848: * SCRAM secret, we must do SCRAM
>>> authentication.
>> Not sure whether you were just listing examples and you weren't suggesting
>> this should be changed, but surely "SCRAM" is pronounced "scram" and is
>> thus "a SCRAM"?
> RFC 5802 uses "a SCRAM something" commonly, but "a SCRAM" alone does
> not make sense:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5802
>
> The sentences quoted above look fine to me.
I don't think anyone was suggesting SCRAM should be used as a noun
rather than as an adjective. But adjectives can be preceded by an
indefinite article just as nouns can. The discussion simply left out the
implied following noun.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2021-06-13 11:43:36 | Re: unnesting multirange data types |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-06-13 11:14:17 | Re: pg_regress.c also sensitive to various PG* environment variables |