| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: "an SQL" vs. "a SQL" |
| Date: | 2021-06-13 11:13:07 |
| Message-ID: | YMXoQ+Z0Iefg8Kxu@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 07:36:54AM +0100, Geoff Winkless wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2021, 15:35 Alvaro Herrera, <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>> src/backend/libpq/auth.c:847: * has. If it's an MD5 hash, we must do
>> MD5 authentication, and if it's a
>> src/backend/libpq/auth.c:848: * SCRAM secret, we must do SCRAM
>> authentication.
>
> Not sure whether you were just listing examples and you weren't suggesting
> this should be changed, but surely "SCRAM" is pronounced "scram" and is
> thus "a SCRAM"?
RFC 5802 uses "a SCRAM something" commonly, but "a SCRAM" alone does
not make sense:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5802
The sentences quoted above look fine to me.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-06-13 11:14:17 | Re: pg_regress.c also sensitive to various PG* environment variables |
| Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2021-06-13 07:34:07 | Re: Continuing instability in insert-conflict-specconflict test |