Re: How to build a new grammer for pg?

From: Chapman Flack <chap(at)anastigmatix(dot)net>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: jacktby <jacktby(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How to build a new grammer for pg?
Date: 2023-08-01 16:50:40
Message-ID: e2f8361a202f0a15c7ad9c52025eb67e@anastigmatix.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2023-08-01 07:58, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 07:36:36PM +0800, jacktby wrote:
>> Hi, I’m trying to develop a new grammar for pg
>
> It's unclear to me whether you want to entirely replace the flex/bison
> parser
> with something else or just add some new bison rule.

Or express a grammar matching PG's in some other parser-generator
language, to enable some other tool to parse PG productions?

Regards,
-Chap

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2023-08-01 17:02:12 Re: New Table Access Methods for Multi and Single Inserts
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2023-08-01 16:37:07 Re: should frontend tools use syncfs() ?