From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Suraj Kharage <suraj(dot)kharage(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tels <nospam-pg-abuse(at)bloodgate(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: documenting the backup manifest file format |
Date: | 2020-04-14 19:03:12 |
Message-ID: | e1f94af9-4c78-539d-f381-2817d6ed5147@2ndQuadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/14/20 1:33 PM, David Steele wrote:
> On 4/14/20 1:27 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> On 2020-Apr-14, David Steele wrote:
>>
>>> On 4/14/20 12:56 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hmm, did David suggest that before? I don't recall for sure. I think
>>>> he had some suggestion, but I'm not sure if it was the same one.
>>>
>>> "I'm also partial to using epoch time in the manifest because it is
>>> generally easier for programs to work with. But, human-readable
>>> doesn't
>>> suck, either."
>>
>> Ugh. If you go down that road, why write human-readable contents at
>> all? You may as well just use a binary format. But that's a very
>> slippery slope and you won't like to be in the bottom -- I don't see
>> what that gains you. It's not like it's a lot of work to parse a
>> timestamp in a non-internationalized well-defined human-readable format.
>
> Well, times are a special case because they are so easy to mess up.
> Try converting ISO-8601 to epoch time using the standard C functions
> on a system where TZ != UTC. Fun times.
>
>
Even if it's a zulu time? That would be pretty damn sad.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Teja Mupparti | 2020-04-14 19:04:07 | Re: Corruption during WAL replay |
Previous Message | Hamid Akhtar | 2020-04-14 19:00:35 | Re: Do we need to handle orphaned prepared transactions in the server? |