Re: TAP tests for pg_verify_checksums

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>
Cc: Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Subject: Re: TAP tests for pg_verify_checksums
Date: 2018-10-09 14:54:44
Message-ID: e06ba1f8-e16c-0bbe-4586-ac6c873d1716@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 06/10/2018 13:46, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 01:38:05PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
>> It's too late for v11 though at this point I guess?
>
> Unfortunately yes.
>
>> I think it would be easy to also test the -r command-line option, as we
>> already create a table.
>
> Good idea. Let's add this test.
>
>> That comment should read 'that checksums are enabled', right?
>
> Indeed. Fixed.
>
>> Otherwise, LGTM and I've tested it without finding any problems.
>
> What do you think about the updated version attached?

Looks pretty good to me.

Let's make sure the test names are useful:

+# Checks cannot happen for an online cluster
+$node->start;
+command_fails(['pg_verify_checksums', '-D', $pgdata],
+ "checksum checks not done");

The test name should be something like "fails with online cluster".

I would also like to see a test that runs against a cluster without
checksums enabled.

Other than that, it appears to cover everything.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Banck 2018-10-09 15:14:50 Re: TAP tests for pg_verify_checksums
Previous Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2018-10-09 14:26:49 Re: out-of-order XID insertion in KnownAssignedXids