|From:||Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>|
|To:||David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>|
|Cc:||Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>|
|Subject:||Re: path toward faster partition pruning|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On 2017/09/15 11:16, Amit Langote wrote:
> I will post rebased patches later today, although I think the overall
> design of the patch on the planner side of things is not quite there yet.
> Of course, your and others' feedback is greatly welcome.
Rebased patches attached. Because Dilip complained earlier today about
clauses of the form (const op var) not causing partition-pruning, I've
added code to commute the clause where it is required. Some other
previously mentioned limitations remain -- no handling of OR clauses, no
elimination of redundant clauses for given partitioning column, etc.
A note about 0001: this patch overlaps with
0003-Canonical-partition-scheme.patch from the partitionwise-join patch
series that Ashutosh Bapat posted yesterday . Because I implemented
the planner-portion of this patch based on what 0001 builds, I'm posting
it here. It might actually turn out that we will review and commit
0003-Canonical-partition-scheme.patch on that thread, but meanwhile apply
0001 if you want to play with the later patches. I would certainly like
to review 0003-Canonical-partition-scheme.patch myself, but won't be able
to immediately (see below).
> Also, I must inform to all of those who're looking at this thread that I
> won't be able to respond to emails from tomorrow (9/16, Sat) until 9/23,
> Sat, due to some personal business.
|Next Message||Ashutosh Bapat||2017-09-15 10:11:23||Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables|
|Previous Message||Kyotaro HORIGUCHI||2017-09-15 08:43:39||Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types|