Re: path toward faster partition pruning

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: path toward faster partition pruning
Date: 2017-09-15 02:16:22
Message-ID: d2be21e5-1375-9290-fb22-c64acc5e226b@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2017/09/15 10:55, David Rowley wrote:
> On 21 August 2017 at 18:37, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I've been working on implementing a way to perform plan-time
>> partition-pruning that is hopefully faster than the current method of
>> using constraint exclusion to prune each of the potentially many
>> partitions one-by-one. It's not fully cooked yet though.
>
> I'm interested in seeing improvements in this area, so I've put my
> name down to review this.

Great, thanks!

I will post rebased patches later today, although I think the overall
design of the patch on the planner side of things is not quite there yet.
Of course, your and others' feedback is greatly welcome.

Also, I must inform to all of those who're looking at this thread that I
won't be able to respond to emails from tomorrow (9/16, Sat) until 9/23,
Sat, due to some personal business.

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Douglas Doole 2017-09-15 02:22:49 Re: Trouble with amcheck
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2017-09-15 02:09:42 Re: Clarification in pg10's pgupgrade.html step 10 (upgrading standby servers)