From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: path toward faster partition pruning |
Date: | 2017-09-15 02:16:22 |
Message-ID: | d2be21e5-1375-9290-fb22-c64acc5e226b@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017/09/15 10:55, David Rowley wrote:
> On 21 August 2017 at 18:37, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I've been working on implementing a way to perform plan-time
>> partition-pruning that is hopefully faster than the current method of
>> using constraint exclusion to prune each of the potentially many
>> partitions one-by-one. It's not fully cooked yet though.
>
> I'm interested in seeing improvements in this area, so I've put my
> name down to review this.
Great, thanks!
I will post rebased patches later today, although I think the overall
design of the patch on the planner side of things is not quite there yet.
Of course, your and others' feedback is greatly welcome.
Also, I must inform to all of those who're looking at this thread that I
won't be able to respond to emails from tomorrow (9/16, Sat) until 9/23,
Sat, due to some personal business.
Thanks,
Amit
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Douglas Doole | 2017-09-15 02:22:49 | Re: Trouble with amcheck |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-09-15 02:09:42 | Re: Clarification in pg10's pgupgrade.html step 10 (upgrading standby servers) |