On 24.02.26 22:07, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
>> It appears so, but then I think we should update the documentation along
>> the lines I showed, because I found it misleading about this. New
>> docs-only patch attached.
>
> +1 for being more explicit here, but that specific wording reads a
> little awkwardly to me. What do you think of the attached?
Sounds good, thanks.