| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Optimize SELECT * in EXISTS |
| Date: | 2026-02-24 21:07:39 |
| Message-ID: | 4037351.1771967259@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> It appears so, but then I think we should update the documentation along
> the lines I showed, because I found it misleading about this. New
> docs-only patch attached.
+1 for being more explicit here, but that specific wording reads a
little awkwardly to me. What do you think of the attached?
(The new code comments are fine, I didn't touch them.)
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-doc-Document-SELECT-in-EXISTS-optimizations.patch | text/x-diff | 2.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ilia Evdokimov | 2026-02-24 21:14:01 | Re: Reduce planning time for large NOT IN lists containing NULL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2026-02-24 20:40:38 | Re: pgsql: libpq: Grease the protocol by default |