Re: pgsql-announce approvals WAS: Beta4 release announcement

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql-announce approvals WAS: Beta4 release announcement
Date: 2010-08-04 14:16:32
Message-ID: dee4149339ed32aaa4689c33d5d31326@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

>> Did anyone answer the question of why announcements are sent to the
>> list before they should go out?

> Oh, that was a mistake; normally they don't.

Is that true? I do seem to recall someone once advocating the idea
of "queuing" messages that would get approved later. Can we officially
can that idea here and now, and use one of the many other venues for
storing drafts, timed messages, and the like?

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201008041016
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkxZdi8ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsiifgCaAq8mF6eV2wMo6Qk0/JUBrWTQ
184AoIaU9YKoGfVkfxQvNMTLhAcIVO+y
=fSnL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-08-04 14:31:09 Re: Mail delays (was: Sending the beta4 release announcement, don't approve ...)
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2010-08-04 14:13:19 Mail delays (was: Sending the beta4 release announcement, don't approve ...)