|From:||David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>|
|To:||Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>|
|Subject:||Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension)|
|Views:||Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email|
On 3/4/17 8:33 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 3/3/17 16:16, David Steele wrote:
>> While this looks like it could be a really significant performance
>> improvement, I think the above demonstrates that it needs a lot of work.
>> I know this is not new to the 2017-03 CF but it doesn't seem enough
>> progress has been made since posting to allow it to be committed in time
>> for v10.
>> I recommend moving this patch to the 2017-07 CF.
> I think the patch that was in 2017-01 was given some feedback that put
> the fundamental approach in question, which the author appeared to agree
> with. So I don't know why this patch appeared in this CF at all.
Then it sounds like it should be marked RWF. Haribabu can resubmit when
there's a new candidate patch.
|Next Message||Julian Markwort||2017-03-04 13:41:52||Re: [FEATURE PATCH] pg_stat_statements with plans|
|Previous Message||Peter Eisentraut||2017-03-04 13:33:48||Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension)|