Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension)

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension)
Date: 2017-03-04 13:40:03
Message-ID: dd403262-7076-3ee7-442e-f1e8e8dd198b@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/4/17 8:33 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 3/3/17 16:16, David Steele wrote:
>> While this looks like it could be a really significant performance
>> improvement, I think the above demonstrates that it needs a lot of work.
>> I know this is not new to the 2017-03 CF but it doesn't seem enough
>> progress has been made since posting to allow it to be committed in time
>> for v10.
>>
>> I recommend moving this patch to the 2017-07 CF.
>
> I think the patch that was in 2017-01 was given some feedback that put
> the fundamental approach in question, which the author appeared to agree
> with. So I don't know why this patch appeared in this CF at all.

Then it sounds like it should be marked RWF. Haribabu can resubmit when
there's a new candidate patch.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julian Markwort 2017-03-04 13:41:52 Re: [FEATURE PATCH] pg_stat_statements with plans
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-03-04 13:33:48 Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension)