| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension) |
| Date: | 2017-03-04 13:33:48 |
| Message-ID: | 9e1c38eb-5208-51a6-65a8-f2987502f4a5@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/3/17 16:16, David Steele wrote:
> While this looks like it could be a really significant performance
> improvement, I think the above demonstrates that it needs a lot of work.
> I know this is not new to the 2017-03 CF but it doesn't seem enough
> progress has been made since posting to allow it to be committed in time
> for v10.
>
> I recommend moving this patch to the 2017-07 CF.
I think the patch that was in 2017-01 was given some feedback that put
the fundamental approach in question, which the author appeared to agree
with. So I don't know why this patch appeared in this CF at all.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Steele | 2017-03-04 13:40:03 | Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension) |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-03-04 13:18:16 | Re: [FEATURE PATCH] pg_stat_statements with plans |