Re: There is a statistic table?

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com>
Cc: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, "waldomiro *EXTERN*" <waldomiro(at)shx(dot)com(dot)br>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: There is a statistic table?
Date: 2009-10-21 22:06:10
Message-ID: dcc563d10910211506l9cd241apc1daaccfb6cc9e18@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Scott Carey <scott(at)richrelevance(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 10/15/09 11:27 PM, "Albe Laurenz" <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> wrote:
>
>> waldomiro wrote:
>>> I need to know how much the postgres is going to disk to get
>>> blocks and how much it is going to cache? witch is the
>>> statistic table and what is the field that indicates blocks
>>> reads from the disk and the memory cache?
>>
>> The view pg_statio_all_tables will show you the number of
>> disk reads and buffer hits per table.
>
> My understanding is that it will not show that.  Since postgres can't
> distinguish between a read that comes from OS cache and one that goes to
> disk, you're out of luck on knowing anything exact.
> The above shows what comes from shared_buffers versus the OS, however.  And
> if reads are all buffered, they are not coming from disk.  Only those that
> come from the OS _may_ have come from disk.

I think he meant pg's shared_buffers not the OS kernel cache.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug Cole 2009-10-21 22:51:25 optimizing query with multiple aggregates
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-10-21 19:12:35 Re: Are unreferenced TOASTed values retrieved?