| From: | "Scott Marlowe" <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gordan Bobic" <gordan(at)bobich(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication Using Triggers |
| Date: | 2008-01-20 00:22:27 |
| Message-ID: | dcc563d10801191622v3febffc4jcf3ee78c58e4f4fa@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Jan 19, 2008 6:14 PM, Gordan Bobic <gordan(at)bobich(dot)net> wrote:
> Gregory Youngblood wrote:
> > On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 23:46 +0000, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> >> David Fetter wrote:
> >> > In that case, use one of the existing solutions. They're all way
> >> > easier than re-inventing the wheel.
> >>
> >> Existing solutions can't handle multiple masters. MySQL can do it at
> >> least in a ring arrangement.
> >>
> > What about pgcluster? It's supposed to be able to provide synchronous
> > multi-master replication for postgresql.
>
> I looked at that, too, but it wasn't really a "cluster of equal peers"
> sort of solution, which is what I am after. Still, thanks for pointing
> it out.
Oh, and there's this too:
Cybertec sync-multi-master
http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.752
http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.752
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gordan Bobic | 2008-01-20 00:34:11 | Re: Replication Using Triggers |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-01-20 00:20:48 | Re: Replication Using Triggers |