| From: | Gordan Bobic <gordan(at)bobich(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication Using Triggers |
| Date: | 2008-01-20 00:34:11 |
| Message-ID: | 47929703.3050805@bobich.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Scott Marlowe wrote:
> On Jan 19, 2008 6:14 PM, Gordan Bobic <gordan(at)bobich(dot)net> wrote:
>> Gregory Youngblood wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 23:46 +0000, Gordan Bobic wrote:
>>>> David Fetter wrote:
>>>>> In that case, use one of the existing solutions. They're all way
>>>>> easier than re-inventing the wheel.
>>>> Existing solutions can't handle multiple masters. MySQL can do it at
>>>> least in a ring arrangement.
>>>>
>>> What about pgcluster? It's supposed to be able to provide synchronous
>>> multi-master replication for postgresql.
>> I looked at that, too, but it wasn't really a "cluster of equal peers"
>> sort of solution, which is what I am after. Still, thanks for pointing
>> it out.
>
> Oh, and there's this too:
>
> Cybertec sync-multi-master
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.752
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.752
The design of that seems suspiciously similar to pgcluster with separate
load balancer and replicator servers.
Gordan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum | 2008-01-20 01:11:13 | Re: Replication Using Triggers |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2008-01-20 00:22:27 | Re: Replication Using Triggers |