| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tristan Partin <tristan(at)partin(dot)io>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: meson and check-tests |
| Date: | 2025-11-21 22:16:33 |
| Message-ID: | dc036284-96e4-4807-89bb-4c479272b59d@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-07-18 Fr 3:19 AM, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 11:22 AM Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 7:06 PM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> It is added and marked as ready for the committer [1]. There are
>>> multiple 'Jian He' users in the commitfest app, so I couldn't add you
>>> as a reviewer; please add yourself.
>>>
>>> [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/51/5405/
>> In order to debug a failure in SQL/PGQ patch, I needed to run
>> regression test with some instrumentation which caused the regression
>> run to take more than 1000 seconds. The failure is seen only in one of
>> the tests. Spending 1000 seconds to reproduce or test patch just for
>> one test seems too expensive. If we commit this patch, we could
>> instead run check-tests equivalent in meson to save time and
>> resources. The patch is ready for a committer already.
> The patches still apply and the CF is in RFC state. Reattaching them
> to get some attention.
>
Committed
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Corey Huinker | 2025-11-21 22:18:59 | Re: CAST(... ON DEFAULT) - WIP build on top of Error-Safe User Functions |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2025-11-21 22:06:36 | Re: apply_scanjoin_target_to_paths and partitionwise join |