Re: Improvement in log message of logical replication worker

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improvement in log message of logical replication worker
Date: 2017-05-24 23:04:25
Message-ID: dbcaf04d-8a0f-654f-50ca-e68c9189c282@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 5/17/17 23:36, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> The patch looks good to me.
> There are some log messages saying just 'logical replication worker
> for subscription ...' in reread_subscription but should we add 'apply'
> to these messages in order for user to distinguish between apply
> worker and table sync worker?

done and done

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-05-24 23:06:50 Re: Improvement in log message of logical replication worker
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-05-24 22:20:59 Re: [PATCH v1] Add and report the new "in_hot_standby" GUC pseudo-variable.