| From: | Adrien NAYRAT <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Kuroda, Hayato" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Log a sample of transactions |
| Date: | 2019-01-16 08:34:33 |
| Message-ID: | db454988-e2d1-1f04-3fff-3904f62d711b@anayrat.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/16/19 1:40 AM, Kuroda, Hayato wrote:
> By the way, I think the name of this parameter should be changed.
> In the Cambridge dictionary, the word "rate" means as follows:
>
> the speed at which something happens or changes,
> or the amount or number of times it happens or changes in a particular period.
>
> This parameter represents "probability" whether it log,
> therefore this name is inappropriate.
> You should use "probability" or "ratio", I think.
Hum, I am not an english native speaker, I choosed "rate" because it is
already used for auto_explain.sample_rate and for log_statement_sample_rate
>
>
> Next week I will give you some comments about your good source.
Thanks!
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Surafel Temesgen | 2019-01-16 08:45:46 | Re: FETCH FIRST clause WITH TIES option |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2019-01-16 08:29:25 | Re: New vacuum option to do only freezing |