| From: | "Kuroda, Hayato" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | 'Adrien NAYRAT' <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | RE: Log a sample of transactions |
| Date: | 2019-01-16 00:40:15 |
| Message-ID: | 1F66B161998C704BABF8989B8A2AC0A315D4AC@G01JPEXMBYT05 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Adrien,
> Your messages looks normal to me, you will have same messages if you put
> log_min_duration to 0.
That was my lack of understanding. Sorry.
By the way, I think the name of this parameter should be changed.
In the Cambridge dictionary, the word "rate" means as follows:
the speed at which something happens or changes,
or the amount or number of times it happens or changes in a particular period.
This parameter represents "probability" whether it log,
therefore this name is inappropriate.
You should use "probability" or "ratio", I think.
Next week I will give you some comments about your good source.
Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
Fujitsu LIMITED
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | James Coleman | 2019-01-16 01:01:31 | Re: Proving IS NOT NULL inference for ScalarArrayOpExpr's |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-01-16 00:23:41 | Re: [PROPOSAL] Shared Ispell dictionaries |