Re: pg_connect takes 3.0 seconds

From: Dmitri Girski <mitek17(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_connect takes 3.0 seconds
Date: 2010-01-09 16:36:50
Message-ID: daed64561001090836l2aadd92awb1e4413e3cf27066@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Thanks for advice, Dave!

This saga ended in an unexpected way: the firewall died.
Since the replacement firewall installed I have not seen any 3 seconds
connects. Well, there was no real load so far, but I will keep checking.

Thanks to everyone replied, it was very helpful.

Cheers,
Dmitri.

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Dave Crooke <dcrooke(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Oops, I meant to mention this too .... virtually all GigE and/or server
> class NICs do TCP checksum offload.
>
> Dimitri - it's unlikely that you have a hardware issue on the NIC, it's
> more likely to be a cable problem or network congestion. What you want to
> look for in the tcpdump capture is things like SYN retries.
>
> A good way to test for cable issues is to use a ping flood with a large
> packet size.
>
> Cheers
> Dave
>
> Hang on a sec. You need to ignore bad checksums on *outbound* packets,
>> because many (most?) Ethernet drivers implement some level of TCP
>> offloading, and this will result in packet sniffers seeing invalid checksums
>> for transmitted packets - the checksums haven't been generated by the NIC
>> yet.
>>
>> Unless you know for sure that your NIC doesn't do TSO, ignore bad
>> checksums on outbound packets from the local interface.
>>
>> --
>> Craig Ringer
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
>> )
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>>
>
>

--
@Gmail

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-01-09 17:07:12 Re: Joint index including MAX() ?
Previous Message Pierre Frédéric Caillaud 2010-01-09 15:37:29 Re: PG optimization question