| From: | Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro(dot)yamada(dot)tf(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tattsu Yama <yamatattsu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor |
| Date: | 2019-09-17 02:34:21 |
| Message-ID: | da3851ec-5676-d970-fbc7-f4798a65fd99@nttcom.co.jp_1 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Alvaro!
>>> Is this fix strictly necessary for pg12, or is this something that we
>>> can leave for pg13?
>>
>> Not only me but many DBA needs this progress report feature on PG12,
>> therefore I'm trying to fix the problem. If you send other patch to
>> fix the problem, and it is more elegant than mine, I can withdraw my patch.
>> Anyway, I want to avoid this feature being reverted.
>> Do you have any ideas to fix the problem?
>
> I committed a fix for the originally reported problem as da47e43dc32e in
> branch REL_12_STABLE. Is that insufficient, and if so why?
Ooops, I misunderstood. I now realized you committed your patch to
fix the problem. Thanks! I'll test it later. :)
Thanks,
Tatsuro Yamada
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-09-17 02:40:14 | Re: refactoring - share str2*int64 functions |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-09-17 02:29:13 | Re: refactoring - share str2*int64 functions |