Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tatsuro Yamada <tatsuro(dot)yamada(dot)tf(at)nttcom(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tattsu Yama <yamatattsu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)pghackers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor
Date: 2019-09-17 02:08:32
Message-ID: 20190917020832.GA20066@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-Sep-17, Tatsuro Yamada wrote:

> On 2019/09/16 23:12, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > Is this fix strictly necessary for pg12, or is this something that we
> > can leave for pg13?
> Not only me but many DBA needs this progress report feature on PG12,
> therefore I'm trying to fix the problem. If you send other patch to
> fix the problem, and it is more elegant than mine, I can withdraw my patch.
> Anyway, I want to avoid this feature being reverted.
> Do you have any ideas to fix the problem?

I committed a fix for the originally reported problem as da47e43dc32e in
branch REL_12_STABLE. Is that insufficient, and if so why?

Álvaro Herrera
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-09-17 02:29:13 Re: refactoring - share str2*int64 functions
Previous Message Tatsuro Yamada 2019-09-17 02:01:28 Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor